IT'S OVER AT LAST !!!!!!!

OK, I've read 'the Deathly Hallows'.

I said I wouldn't buy the last Harry Potter, but my Mum got it for me.

So, my thoughts;

Boy does the woman waffle! You've got to keep reading just to get to any action. How much description and meandering conversations and exposition can you have without giving anything away? It could have been edited down to at least half the page count and still been a decent story.

At least they stayed away from Hogwarts for most of the book. I was afraid it was going to be OotP again, which started promisingly, but then ended up being much of the same old, same old again. We were spared the lessons, the quiddich, the outsmarting of Snape at least.

I didn't think she'd be brave enough to kill of any of the three main characters. I did feel regret over Hedwig, but most of the other deaths were secondary characters at best. I felt sorry for Lupin and Tonks, but after giving Remus a really good introduction in PoA, she didn't do anything more with the character.

I think part of the problem with the stories are that they never break away from Harry. I know it's his book, but he spent so much of it isolated from everyone else and everything else. Having scenes showing what Vordlemort was doing would have brought home the gravity of the situation better. Again this is what OotP failed at. During the whole book, it felt like the Order wasn't doing anything, and they might not have been there. I would like to see that side of the conflict written about, as there was so much more going on that we just didn't see. (Imagine B5 being written just from the point of view of one character. Boring and frustrating.)

I have one big question, which I haven't looked to see if there is an answer on the net, because I only finished the book this morning. How did Neville get the sword of Godric Gryffindor?

More Potter Madness

Just over a month to go to book 7.

You don't even have to say which book 7, there only seems to be the one (No, I am not going to start chanelling 'Highlander').

I wrote before about the utter madness of what is just an OK set of books. Yes, I will read it, but I won't buy it. Last time I had a very nice Brownie lend me her copy to read before she did. This time, I'm not sure when I'm going to get my hands on one.

I repeat - I am not going to buy one. But how to stop people telling me spoilers?

I'll make a badge I thought to myself. Then I went ahead and made a design to put up on Cafepress. This should stop the blabbers in their tracks. They can be purchased at http://www.cafepress.com/harry7

Of course, not wanting to leave anyone out, I adapted the design for those who are even more tired of Harry Potter than I am. Might create a bit of a commotion, and can be found at http://www.cafepress.com/antiharry7

The problem after the 21st July is that the publishers won't have a book 8 to make loads of money on. You can bet lots of different variations on the theme are going to appear (more than there are already) as they try to replicate the success. I'd tell them not to try, but look for something different. If you try to clone HP, you are just going to fail.

Just publish me instead.

Harry Potter and Librarian Madness

I will be so glad when this July comes around and the last of the 'Harry Potter' books are published.

As can be read here, http://news.uk.msn.com/Article.aspx?cp-documentid=4631719
American libraries are under a 'no peek' rule with the new books.

Oh pleeeeeeeease!

I can't believe how much J K Rowling has been hyped. Yes the books are good and readable, and I have read every one of them. I shall read the latest, but I shall probably borrow a copy. I just don't think they are the greatest stories to be set down in print.

The first book was good and original, the second not too bad, and the third OK. I think the rot started to set in with the fourth. The page count jumped enormously, but the storyline didn't evolve along with that. Part of the problem is that Rowling seems to be able to write only one story and after six books it is getting a bit stale.

The end of the fourth book (Goblet of Fire) promised good things to come with the revival of Voldemort, and the beginning of the fifth (Order of the Pheonix) had my hopes rising. Harry looked to be expelled from Hogwarts, join the Order and fight Voldemort with Cirrus Black and Lupin. I really would have liked to read that story.

But no.

It's back to Hogwarts, Quiddich, a new DADA teacher, and everything else that was written about in every other book. And Lord Voldemort actually does very little. Even the end of the sixth book (Half Blood Prince), Harry says he is not going to return to Hogwarts. I don't believe that because that would mean writing a different story.

Really, the story with Voldemort would work better if condensed into three books instead of trying to stretch it out to seven. As the most dangerous character in the magical world he actually hasn't done anything since being brought back from the dead at the end of book four. I think Rowling should have not mentioned Voldemort so prominently in the first two or three books. Then she should have dropped most of the Hogwarts elements and concentrated on 'He who shall not be named'. Trying to have the two different story strands side-by-side just hasn't worked over the long term.

I don't know when the world went Harry Potter mad, but it needs to wake up. Maybe after this summer it will.